What does this court jargon mean?


#1

It sounds to me like you are quoting language related to a motion to intervene in the action by a third party. If that is the case it means they are granting the third person the status of a party in the litigation because they have a legal interest in the outcome and their rights cannot be protected if they are not a party.

P.S. Please feel free to bring up this or any other topic on our live call-in show every Wednesday at 11:00 a.m. EST. Visit radio.rosen.com/live for details

Helena M. Nevicosi
Attorney with Rosen Law Firm

4101 Lake Boone Trail, Suite 500
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
919.787.6668 main phone
919.787.6361 main fax

Charlotte Office
301 McCullough Drive
Suite 510
Charlotte, NC 28262
Main Phone: (704)307.4600
Main Fax: (704) 9343.0044

Durham & Chapel Hill Office
1829 East Franklin Street
Building 600
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
(919) 321.0780

ROSEN.COM

The response posted above is based upon the limited factual information made available and is not intended as a full and complete response to the question. The only reliable manner to obtain complete and adequate legal advice is to consult with an attorney, fully explain your situation, and allow the attorney sufficient opportunity to research the applicable law and facts required to render an accurate opinion. The basic information provided above is intended as a public service only, a full discussion with an attorney should be undertaken before taking any action. The information posted on this forum is available for public viewing and is not intended to create an attorney client relationship with any individual. These answers are provided for informational purposes only, a person should consult with their own individual legal counsel before taking any action that could affect their legal rights or obligations.


#2

“That by virtue of the temporary custody order entered on ( ), which concluded that it was in the best interest of the minor child to be placed with ( ), ( ) has obtained an interest in the outcome of this litigation, her interests are inadequately represented and she would be greatly prejudiced if her motion were denied.”

…The judge should feel sorry for her because she has a legal aid attorney??? She should win just based upon that??