In September I was Served a DVPO (Domestic Violence Protective Order).
-
We had a court date, but our case was not reached, so we get to go back in October.
-
The form that was Filed showing the new court date is called an “Order Continuing Domestic Violence Hearing and Ex Parte Order”.
It states that - “The Court Orders that the ex parte order entered in this case is continued in effect until the date of the hearing set above”
I know this as there is a CheckMark beside this statement. -
My STBX’s lawyer told me there was two exceptions to the Court Order now (which she hand wrote in the “Notes to Clerk” section on the Form):
a. Defendant can call the minor children from xxx - xxx daily (I hid the time for privacy).
b. Def may see the minor children on Oct xx from xx AM - xx PM and Def may pick up / drop off minor children from the marital home.
c. All the rest of the DVPO remains in affect.
MY QUESTION
Is my STBX’s Lawyer considered the “COURT” ?
In the “Ex Parte Domestic Violence Order of Protection” pg 4 of 5, it states that ONLY the “COURT” or the JUDGE can change the Court Order.
To me the Lawyer is NOT the “COURT”.
PLEASE CONFIRM as:
The other day, my child (12 yrs old) left me a voice mail stating mom’s lawyer said “the children can contact Dad ANYTIME they want to”.
My STBX’s Friend left me a voice mail the same day stating the same too.
Additionally - my child informed me during our allotted phone call that I was to pick them up from different location than our House,
because mom’s lawyer said it was okay.
I am trying everything I can to adhere to this DVPO, but feel like this lawyer is trying to set me up in a trap because I do not have a lawyer to help me.
I have seen a Lawyer (consultation), however do NOT have the money to retain one.