Ellison gained standing by contending a Parent Child relationship. As far as the legal definition of a parent in the NCGS there are several articles that hold some sort of definition, all of them include the custody and care.
My question is did Ellison succeed in gaining standing through the Parent Child relationship because she was watching the child alone after the defendant moved away and thus meeting the custody and care standard?
What is the legal guidelines for judges in evidence and documentation for the Parent Child relationship? If anyone who lives with a child (with the primary parent) then any step parent would not have to adopt they would simply qualify themselves as having a Parent Child relationship.
Could you explain this situation as my ex-wife and ex-stepmother to my child is suing for visitation claiming a parent child relationship even though I refused to allow her to adopt (early troubles in the two and a half year marriage and 14 month separation) and consistantly told her that where my child is concerned I alone make the decisions.
I have had sole custody all of my sons life and she asked him to call her Mama which I did allow. Please clarify?